We could go a number of different directions with this one, but James Levinson Jewelry asks:
If you haven't seen the ring before, it's pretty amazing! A 16.5 carat emerald cut center stone with a 2 carat trapezoid on either side. Wow!
Normally, if the couple gets married and then divorced, the bride keeps the ring. That's etiquette. If the breakup happened before marriage, Kris would have the right to keep it. Now, we don't know the exact circumstances surrounding the alleged breakup, if there was a prenup, or who even actually paid for the ring etc. However, all things being equal, should that unwritten rule of Kim keeping the ring apply in this situation?
For one, the marriage lasted two months...but we're sure Kris needs the rock more than Kim from a financial point of view. Even though Kris isn't exactly in the "Poor House" with his $3.2 million NBA salary from last year, Kim definitely seems to be the bread winner in that pairing.
In addition, Kris may not get to put his hands on the OTHER "rock," aka the basketball, for a while because of the NBA labor mess.
So, should normal divorce etiquette apply here? Who SHOULD keep the ring?